http://www.delos.fantascienza.com Taken from the site written by Roberto Quaglia.
As Philip Dick is able to remove the reality and the collapse of all certainties. As Robert Sheckley is able to laugh about it. But how many comparisons you can search, the only sure thing is that Roberto Quaglia is unique. And perhaps it is fortunate.
(follow-up: The collapse of the American Empire, the movie)
notice to mariners.
This is a science fiction magazine. This article was fiction. What follows is pure speculation, and so it is not true. No court has certified true. No reporter has written. No news has said. So it's not true. Do not argue against that is false. Think of it as Schrödinger's cat, simultaneously and paradoxically both a creature alive than dead, either true or false, until the moment when someone will really control how things are. Or, if you can problematic, simply this: do not believe a single word of what follows from this moment on, and enjoy the ride in wonderland paying attention to the landscape.
Nothing would be what is
Because everything would be what is not
And also the opposite - that is, not
And what is not, it would
See?
From "Alice in Wonderland" by Lewis Carroll
I have to admit it. I was there at the moment I fell. There was a waterfall Oriana Fallaci. We were all fooled.
They wrote and Luigi Silvio Sosio Pachì editorial in the number of Delos 69, September 2001: It is not easy to deal with science fiction, when reality pushes ahead of the worst fantasies, surpasses incorrectly on the right, and science fiction seems to remain nothing more to say.
the same issue on Stochastic thought I addressed this issue in my way, I believe - as victims of Orson Wells decades earlier - it was going to broadcast the reality, rather than - as would come out later - the first episode of a new series of popular television drama. Already the evening of 11 September, however, some doubts I had come, but I had not taken seriously, stored in the closet of paranoia free. Doubts were raised me from a simple analysis of which prodest, that is, who is that eventually we will win in this business. Probably 90% of all the mysteries of the political-criminal world can be solved in a lucid answer to this simple question coined by our wise ancestors. But it lacked the data to give substance to the fantasies, or otherwise lacking in me. Others already knew everything. The commander of Russian aviation Anatoli Kornukov, so for example, declared already the day after the attack that carrying out such an operation is generally regarded as impossible (1), while ironically, Putin offered the U.S. of Russia's willingness to provide future protection of U.S. airspace. Tom Clancy said that if he wrote a book in which events occur just taken place, no publisher would publish it, judging it completely implausible.
At the time of writing half a year has passed since that fateful day and the data, meanwhile, jumped out and are available to everyone. Certainly not find them on the big headlines in newspapers or on the news or in the words of the commentators uptight and boring marked by terror, not to appear politically correct and lose their privileges. But in the folds of reality today there are data, you just know how to find. And on the Internet, fortunately, the folds of the fact there are enough, and it is there - and not the media slaves of occult forces and conformism stupid - the information to be found in the latest release of the Global Village.
I invite you not to believe what you read, take account of face reading a story of political fiction and enjoy it as if it were not true. Even if it were true it would be harder to enjoy it. I promise to confuse you, yes, very much. I'm not here to tell you the truth. Far be it from me, this presumption reveal all! I just have to disturb your sleep of reason, crept into that dream with open eyes on the air in your brain since the day without you decide to go to the movies, the cinema came to you disguised as news, the day when the most extraordinary colossal media of all time, the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, had its glorious and unforgettable Before television networks unified around the world. Great show, great special effects! But the magic of this superb work of fiction can be appreciated only in the performance of penetrating deep into the product. The backstage of America Under Attack is actually the true masterpiece, discovering who they are actually actors and who appeared, who the directors and producers who, to appreciate the courage of the stunts, to admire the genius of the writers, to be amazed by the ingenuity of the great American masters and unmatched special effects.
In the minds of all of us there is a history, and is the story of what happened on September 11, 2001 in Manhattan, New York. This story actually exists in the minds of most people of the globe, at least those who live in areas reached by television. But even in the most remote and wild areas of the less civilized world, I believe that pieces of that history are still joints. This is what you call a great success! Humbug are told in the same way all over the world. That of 11 September 2001 is one of them. Even the story of God is told equally everywhere (look at how many religions are there!). The story of 11 September 2001 but is unique and unambiguous. What greater heresy then forget for a moment that the story of 11 September 2001 and venture into the uncharted territory of another virgin story 11 September 2001? Let's go, ordunque: the schism of memes has finally begun! It will be the meme schismatic contagious as the one from which it has changed?
To tell another story we must first assume that the existing story is all or partly false. It 's a mere technical necessity, then I do not want you at this stage if I am forced to introduce this annoying situation. There is no need for you to stop believing that you already know the story - indeed! I urge you to keep all your existing beliefs, without confusing my narrative with something real.
If, for purely technical needs, we must assume that the original story of 11 September 2001 is false in whole or in part, our new history can not do without a theory of conspiracy. I know it's trivial, on the other hand all the stories of the world are ultimately trivial, and the good stories of other worlds are still confined to the other worlds to which they belong.
A good plot needs conspirators (otherwise it becomes a matter supernatural). Since the story is heretical and alternative, the conspirators can be chosen only among those who historically play the role of the Orthodox Good.
begin quietly, simply, without excessive machinations. We start with a minimal revision of history, just to prepare the palate.
History revisited 11 September 2001, version 1. 0 (soft)
American intelligence services, the Pentagon and the Bush administration were well aware of what was going to happen on 11 September, and gave precise instructions to ensure that air defense systems - which in these cases is automatically released - not activated. They wanted a free hand by the American people to go and where we take the oil for its own benefit and redraw the geopolitical map of Eurasia, and the only way to achieve the internal consensus necessary to launch new wars was enough to terrorize the American people. The sequence of events has shown that the method was functional. The U.S. government has obtained from its own people carte blanche to do literally whatever they want, abolished civil rights and burst according to the latest episodes are attacking freedom of the press. And it is to achieve these objectives, being aware of the plans of Al Qaeda, they have decided to let them come to a satisfactory conclusion. This version of events seems plausible. He, however, some important weaknesses. For example, why the terrorists have been thrown into the Twin Towers in the early morning, when they were almost empty? A couple of hours later and the victims were tens of thousands. Why not have affected the lower, thereby increasing a number of victims and the likelihood of and fully analyzed by the organizers, and then nothing happens at random. The timing - the timing - this kind of operation is essential. So why the planes were not hijacked the towers at any other time of the day, making 10 times more victims? Why did not allocate at least an aircraft against the Indian Point nuclear power plant, less than 40 miles from New York? One of the two planes had flown over seven minutes before reaching the tower, we passed by another, less than two minutes of flight. Choosing the nuclear inter alia, the terrorists would have minimized the risk of being intercepted by American fighter planes (as normally would have happened - and you surely would not suggest that the terrorists knew from the beginning that the fighters would not have lifted off to intercept them!) in the seven-minute flight that we still wanted to reach Manhattan. By hitting the nuclear power plant could easily cause a disaster much worse than Chernobyl causing millions of deaths (the reactors were not built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 767 full of fuel (2)) and put the knee really hated enemy. But no, the terrorists were not cruel underneath it so bad, and maybe because they have acted to cause the least amount of deaths as possible, with the most spectacular effect. Even the Pentagon could have done far more damage consistent aiming at any other point of the building. If you arrange the attack was really Al Qaeda, there are perhaps their terms to withdraw the license of terrorists, for obvious incompetence? In criminology, the analysis of motive is a fundamental step to reach the truth. What motive could have terrorists to cause the least amount of deaths as possible with their attack? And if the least amount of deaths was not their goal because they do not have acted differently, in a much more lethal, because they could do it? But the real
weakest point in the soft version of the plot is absurd liabilities of U.S. intelligence, relegated to the role of inert spectators of what was happening, a role that just does not fit them. They do not have the physique du role for the character of the inert spectator! Which brings us to the hard version of this story.
History revisited 11 September 2001, version 2. 0 (hard)
American intelligence services if they were not with the hand to hand for years and years to look for hope that finally someone was planning an attack as it should be in America to finally do what they did later (wars, civil rights, abolition, etc..), have instead actively participated in organizing the attacks.
Given the choice, consider more credible the first release this new version soft or hard? On the other hand, there really is a substantial moral difference between one or the other? I do not think, and I believe that the authors of the conspiracy they know very well why you do not understand why once you have chosen a course of action should be limited to root for the terrorists decide to enter in action on its own initiative, rather than taking an active role best suited to the peculiarities and traditions of their role and ensure that the necessary things were done well and timely. Would be incredibly stupid if, judging a cheap sensational terrorist attack on the American people and symbols, sheep turning thumbs wait for someone else decides to take care of their own accord. And if you still hesitate because you think the moral of the transaction, you still have an idea of \u200b\u200bthe childish world. Not convinced? Do you believe that no one could go so far? Profit you then learn that, according to declassified U.S. documents (ie official information) already forty years ago the CIA had planned terrorist attacks against its striking civilians same (sinking of ships, bombings in Washington, etc..) attacks that were attributed to the regime of Fidel Castro and that they served as a pretext for the U.S. invasion of Cuba . These plans were presented for approval at John F. Kennedy, who refused to sign them and then on the CIA's apparent intention to dismantle or at least drastically reduce the power. A few months later he was assassinated forty years ago in a sign that rained political connections. (3a, 3b) I really believe that over the years a crisis of conscience did the CIA become the most good? Also because this time
was to meet a schedule. E 'has been proven that the war in Afghanistan had already been planned for a year, not because the Taliban stink, but because with them you could not reach an agreement for a pipeline to pass important. He had already been decided even the war began in October 2001. But it lacked a pretext for war, but as seen from the idea of \u200b\u200bmagically appeared just at a time when there was no need.
But everything is not really credible, the natural thought that at this point anyone would have used to the old story, fascinating theory, but unrealistic. If this were true, someone in America would come a few suspicion.
No problem. We have architected well our great little heresy, and our story takes into account the people in America who was immediately suspicious. And it is here that a new character enters the scene and apparently very bad: the anthrax. The threat of anthrax
Anthrax, who has never heard of it? It was not bad as a character, a guy who had never seen before, unable to sleep the nightmares of unreleased crowd of young and old, in fact, could have a future in show business. Instead, it mysteriously disappeared from the scene with the same rapidity with which he appeared. There's a reason so much forgetfulness. Anthrax only served to entertain the public for a while ', taking up the horror throughout the country and at the same time discouraging the initiation of dangerous commissions of inquiry. The only real potential enemy Pentagon-CIA-Bush alliance was the United States Senate because of his investigative powers. And, as it happens - but how many coincidences there are in this story! - The Senate has been a favorite target of the anthrax terrorists. Not only that, but one of the intended victims was Senator Tom Daschle, Democratic majority leader of the watch case, the man who could give way to a committee of inquiry. . . (4) Curious
this science fiction book that jumps out peeking behind the scenes, right? Luckily it's only fiction. . . (You did not because the University of California in its meticulous analysis (5) in which it is shown that the source of the anthrax letters was a U.S. government program). But go on. You do not really know anything about who exactly would have packed the anthrax letters? But so you know, it's just that you do not the newspapers and television news are told, and you're too lazy to find information on the Internet, where things are now in the public domain: first, sequence analysis of DNA of anthrax used showed that it was produced by the U.S. military laboratories (6), also claims that someone in the United States there was only one person can have access to that specific quality of anthrax, such a Dr. Hatfill, which of course would have worked tirelessly with the CIA and was one of the few people in the U.S. can arm the anthrax spores. Dr. Hatfill was not arrested, which is still curious, but in America is in the eye of a small tornado, and analysts speculate that he is now fighting for his life because a solution Oswald (the murderess of Kennedy killed to shut the mouth) is already being prepared for him. (7a, 7b, 7c, 7d, 7e, 7f, 7g) Which is not to say that Dr. Hatfill is actually the real culprit. It would be too simple. There are indeed other microbiologists could Having worked on this, but unfortunately they are all recently died in mysterious conditions. In fact, since 11 September 2001 at least 15 known microbiologists around the world have perished in a very unnatural death. All in connection with anthrax? No, of course not, because in truth there is much worse in dance - but more about that later. Some of the dead scientists, however, is likely to have had anything to do with anthrax. For example, Professor Dr. Don C. Wiley, a professor at Harvard and one of the most respected American microbiologists, who died exactly as you die in spy movies and with perfect timing: the anthrax letters have recently ceased to move when Dr. Wiley, who has never shown signs of depression or mental disorders or, at 10 pm on November 15, 2001 leaves a group of friends and colleagues with whom he met on the way home and abandon your car hire with a full tank and the keys in the ignition on a bridge, then jumps into the river and die, rather than go to the airport in Memphis where the family was waiting for a holiday in Iceland. Great interpretation! Great spy movie! (8a, 8b, 8c, 8d)
discoverer of possible perpetrators or potential perpetrators? The question is superfluous. What interests us here is that the anthrax letters sent by the so-called Arab angry when America bombed Afghanistan to its stated purpose of preventing these scenarios were not shipped nor Arabs nor Muslims, but by most Christian and supposedly patriotic Americans.
And so the anthrax letters would be sent if the Americans alone! On the other hand - let's face it - what kind of fanatical Islamic fundamentalist terrorists who would never, and being armed with anthrax in the United States with full opportunity to act, sends only - as they did - the occasional letter here and there instead of sending thousands and thousands of letters and everywhere plagued with anthrax railway stations and airports, paralyzing the nation with real terror and creating a real damage to the organization calendar of the hated United States? Already at the time of this nonsense I was surprised and suspicious. Sending only a few letters here and there instead of thousands of letters to anyone the terrorists clearly a dilettante incompatible with the possession of a biological weapon so sophisticated. Finally, do not forget that some 'terrorist anthrax is also a great business for the pharmaceutical industry, which certainly does not hurt. (9a, 9b), especially if the only company with the license to produce the vaccine is a certain BioPort Inc., a company that seems created specifically to make money on a market - mass vaccination against anthrax - non-existent at the time of creation of society. BioPort Inc. found in the capital of course the infamous Carlyle Group (which lately - I mention it to feel closer to home - has also bought a piece of FIAT www. Carlylegroup. Net), which is to say - listen! hear! - Joint interests of the Bush family and the Bin Laden family. (10a, 10b, 10c, 10d, 10th, 10f)
On the other hand (side note) the anthrax vaccine had been shown to be a significant business during the first gulf war, no matter who later footnote Gulf War Syndrome - most likely caused by the vaccine - as many as 15. 000 American soldiers have died away from the cameras - so you do not have never seen on TV. (11a, 11b)
The Pakistani intelligence
Good. We got a first look at the backstage of the colossal America Under Attack and indeed we found it fascinating, evil plots, twists and sensational new mysterious questions, but who says that things have gone this way? Where is the evidence? If we want to create a story that has a minimum of credibility we need more data are consistent with our thesis.
may then help to learn that a bank of 100. $ 000 was sent to Mohammed Atta, the leader of the suicide hijackers a few days before Sept. 11, by Ahmad Umar Sheikh, a senior Pakistani intelligence (not Afghanistan or Iraq, mind you, yet Pakistan has never been bombed). Be ', a faithless servant happens to all the secret services, what's the problem? The important thing is that the head of the secret service is reliable. And the proof of the loyalty of top Pakistani intelligence no doubt. It 'nice to discover that in fact the leader of the Pakistani secret service ISI, General Mahmoud Ahmad made a trip of a week in America, as of September 4, 2001 in quick succession by visiting both the CIA and the Pentagon that the White House. The previous time that a Pakistani intelligence chief had gone on a visit to Washington, the consequence was - the week after - the coup in Pakistan that has Musharaf in power. Other connections
But how many amazing coincidences in this story are here! Not enough for you yet? Well, then how about the fact that the wing of the Pentagon destroyed by the attack was emptied of all officials for important reasons, restoration of the building just a week before September 11? (12) Other coincidences? How greedy you are! Be ', then I guess all remember the famous stock market speculation, to the detriment of United Airlines and other companies penalized by the attack, which occurred in the days immediately prior to September 11, only speculation who knew of terrorist plot could be carried out. At the time there was a great babble, in newspapers, on investigating the fact that speculators could be traced back to the terrorists. Have you ever heard of this? No, eh? Who knows why. . . And 'certainly just a coincidence that many of these financial speculation had been made by Deutschebank / AB Brown, operated until 1998 by the Executive Director of the CIA, AB Krongard. (13) After all, maybe the connections are like cherries, one leads to another, there is no actual relationship between them. . . The icing on the cake: the irony of fate (fate?) On the morning of September 11 in the seat CIA was doing an exercise for the theoretical case where a plane had accidentally hit a building. (14a, 14b, 14c)
Now finally the plot begins to resemble a book of those tough, a hybrid between Frederik Forsythe and Mack Reynolds, and for that we are passionate about much more than mediocre B-movie that America Under Attack hype has convinced us to follow.
The sublime aspect of this mystery is that all this information in the public domain. Some background can be found in Italian (15). A brilliant and meticulous exposure of much of the material is read in English instead. (16a, 16b, 16c) You can find a detailed chronology of key events (17a, 17b) and a concise and compelling summary of the key steps is offered by Michael C. Ruppert (18) former U.S. agent in the fight against drug trafficking (he left after discovering that the CIA trafficked drugs and demolished the career of a director of the CIA on the ropes in putting a face to face television), author of an interesting webzine some success (19) even among the high echelons of American, even in environments where it is not healthy to have too much success, (20) in a piece titled A calendar of terror before and after September 11. (21) There are also other interesting timeline. (22a, 22b)
Gore Vidal calls for the impeachment
But by far the most elegant narration of what happened and their backgrounds is contained in an essay by Gore Vidal, The Enemy Within, (23a, 23b), published in Italy together with other essays in the book The lies of the empire. (24)
It 'important to note that Gore Vidal is not any one guy. This is a great American writer and intellectual who once was a personal friend of John F. Kennedy, Eleanor Roosevelt (wife of the President), Tennessee Williams and Truman Capote. Vidal for the moment (carefully?) Marries the soft version of the plot, but the gist is the same.
And it is precisely that of Gore Vidal, one of the most authoritative voices in the clamor for the impeachment of George W. Bush to top betrayal. But it is not the only one. The 2004 U.S. presidential candidate Lyndon H. LaRouche Jr. (25) compares the junta behind Bush and Dick Cheney around the Nazis, says that the Nazis as they are fanatical and insane and defines Donald Rumsfeld Dr. Strangelove II. These are the words of a candidate for president of the United States (not Iraq). (26)
In a little known 'link to Americans who want Bush's impeachment for reasons far more serious than those for which it was attempted impeachment of Clinton. (27a, 27b, 27c, 27d, 27th, 27F, 27G, 27h) to be included in that
to investigate Clinton's genitals were spent in America $ 62 million, versus $ 3 million spent so far investigate the events of 11 September. If math is not subjective, it follows that the United States of America details of Clinton's extramarital sex are twenty times more important than the details of the worst terrorist attack ever deployed against the American people.
The visions of Bush
Yet Bush has done everything to become suspicious and merit some investigation. On the same day of the attack, for example, said they had seen on television the impact of the first plane into the tower. It 'was the only one in the world to see him on TV, since apart from the amateur video of the firemen (blown out days later), there are no official archive of the first event. Yet Bush said he had seen on TV the first plane impact even before the second plane hit, and then, if not live, slightly delayed. So there are two cases: either the President of the United States of America is suffering from hallucinations (and so should be treated) or - more realistically - he has actually seen on TV the first plane crash into the tower, in a closed-circuit TV, before entering the elementary school where he was to give a speech. Such events are not trifles on which their memories may be confused. I believe that each of us remember the exact years later the precise moment when for the first time we saw on television the dramatic image of the attack on the WTC, then you do not understand why the President of the United States should make an exception, especially a few hours after the event. Twice he said he saw the first plane. Here is the exact text of his statement:
1. Well, Jordan, you're not going to believe what I was in was when i heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my Chief of Staff, Andy Card - Actually, I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower - the TV Was Obviously on. And I used to fly, myself, and I Said, well, there's one terrible pilot. I said, it must have been a horrible accident. But I was whisked off there, I didn't have much time to think about it. And I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my Chief of Staff, who is sitting over here, walked in and said, 'A second plane has hit the tower, America is under attack. (28)
2. Anyway, I was sitting there, and my Chief of Staff — well, first of all, when we walked into the classroom, I had seen this plane fly into the first building. There was a TV set on. And you know, I thought it was pilot error and I was amazed that anybody could make such a terrible mistake. And something was wrong with the plane, or — anyway, I'm sitting there, listening to the briefing, and Andy Card came and said, 'America is under attack. '(29)
A video of Bush in the primary school during the attack is available online. (30a, 30b, 30c, 30d, 30e)
Plausible deniability
of curiosity in this matter there are at will. Like the fact that by the attack on the Twin Towers was made into a film even before the event happen. This is Lone Gunman, (31) show a spin-off of X-Files in which three guys a bit 'quirky publish a magazine (The Lone Gunman) working to uncover the mysteries of state. In the first episode they discover a plot by the Pentagon (or rather some general concerns about the decline of funds) to bring down the twin towers with Boeing 747 line. This show was broadcast in early 2001. The episode is the pilot of the series, even though in subsequent performances is not retransmitted. (32) Coincidence? Yes, of course, we've seen a lot in this matter, that a more or less makes no difference. However
. . .
Science fiction comes to the rescue once again, proposing an alternative interpretation of a certain charm and appeal, and that of Plausible deniability (smentibilità plausible): I do not know if you know the television series Stargate, the one where there is the "gate" that allows you to travel the galaxy, and has held a top secret military project. In an episode happens that a leak of information is initiated the production of a science fiction show based on the Stargate program. One would expect that the military did so to boycott it and put everything to rest, but leave him alone, for the principle of Plausible deniability: from that moment on, whatever there had been leaks from the Stargate project could easily be ridiculed saying that it was taken from the science fiction show.
At this point one wonders: 1) the idea for the September 11 we had her seeing the show? 2) Who wrote the show has taken the idea from some leak? 3) the show was done on purpose to make fun of any situation like that too plot? Once upon a time
journalism. America, that of free journalism has made a true legend - the case with Watergate, Pulitzer Prizes, films that focus on the indomitable courage of journalists in search of truth and so on - in this respect seems to have lost all contact with decency . The alignment of the U.S. media to government positions has recently reached levels of true farce. In the U.S. there are only five major television networks, who say the same things and say nothing about those things. What motivates them to act to support the escalation in the military dictatorship that is taking place today in America? What convinced them to support the actual process of nazistificazione the United States of America that we see - of course if we look in the right direction and through the smoke screens? (33)
Maybe. . . money?
Which brings us back to another famous movie, 007 Tomorrow Never Dies, where a large newsnetwork magnate seeks to wage war in order to make money documentation.
The current policy of the U.S. government - to carry out attacks against its own people and wage war against countries that allow America to better position themselves on the global chessboard - is a real boon to an economic point of view on major television networks. Wars to terrorist attacks stick people on television and useful advertising rears.
Could it be that - in the words of Andreotti - to think the worst is a sin, but one guesses?
Do not think that the same 007 Tomorrow Never Dies has been an operation of Plausible deniability? (This option seems a bit 'pulled by the hair, but since it came to me in mind, however, mention, if only for aesthetic reasons).
On the other hand, in whatever direction you look there are pieces of the puzzle that fit together neatly, while the overall design becomes clearer and you wonder if you're not mad as John Forbes Nash Jr, the protagonist of A Beautiful Mind .
The New Pearl Harbour
George W. Bush has repeatedly stated that the September 11, 2001 for the United States is the date of the new Pearl Harbor, which translated means that since America was attacked, the war has begun and will last a long time. Too bad that many people in America is not very skilled in matters of history and has very clear ideas on Pearl Harbour, particularly among young people is probably not even know what it is, that the word does not mean anything at Pearl Harbour for them. Not bad. Luck once again we run to the rescue. After more than half a century after the event, just four months before Sept. 11 - then with perfect timing - released worldwide the blockbuster film Pearl Harbour, which refreshes all memory of what Pearl Harbor was and what it meant for America. Or rather, it refreshes all the memory of what Pearl Harbor was not, since it is widely recognized by historians not only against the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor did not come unexpected to the American leadership, but President Roosevelt did even everything to provoke the Japanese attack, so as to provide a pretext for going to war. If so give me time, then, the continuous parallel between Bush proposed on September 11, 2001 and December 7, 1941 show that, paradoxically, has once again played dirty, very dirty, dirty, at least as autumn 1941, if not some little something more. And even the movie on Pearl Harbor, among other things, apart from the special effects were really poor. I was then asked what sense he ever get to do a film like that. It is now clear. Psyop. (34)
Confirmation Bias
The truly remarkable aspect of this business is that despite all the data in the public domain on the Internet, nothing happens. What I mean by nothing happens? Be ', the backstage is showing us a different kind of film than the official one, a film such as those in which the end I think Clint Eastwood - the only person in the world who understood everything, and we hunted in vain by apples CIA throughout the film - to foil the evil plot and to do justice by forcing the President of the United States to commit suicide, after the bad apples of the CIA are all dead in the usual stupid ways in which the bad guys die in American movies. Instead, you have to understand everything is not a man, but an entire meta-community that shines on the Internet, in which information flows, and outlines a plan is refined more and more defined and consistent, which is put to writing. And all this, instead of triggering a global revolt against the conspirators, does not produce reactions of any kind by any party. The good citizens of the American empire continue to burn from their television screens rations pseudo-daily press reports, the millions of travelers of the Internet never happen on pages where they could take a less naive view of the world where there are and if you happen to us do not notice that much, while the evil intelligence that he planned what - people known to be ruthless - does not care at all for this movement of chilling secrets, do not try to close the servers that host this information on the Internet (well, someone actually had little problems...), do not try to kill or otherwise deter those who spread dangerous information. . . (I hope not!) Now that's science fiction. But maybe. . . maybe. . . There is also some explanation on this. As Gore Vidal
also argues in his essay cited above, plus a big lie is, the easier it will be believed. . . if the option not to believe it is sufficiently painful. In this there is nothing magical. Our psyche is structured so as to believe that it Convenga believe. The painful truth is usually denied by the mind. Compared to accept a truth too painful, it is not uncommon for a mind prefers to take refuge even in the madness - that's called a denial of reality than any evidence.
The American people have been deeply traumatized by the events of 11 September 2001. The mere fact of taking into account the idea to organize an event so terrible could have been the President of the United States of America, in agreement with the Director of the CIA and the Pentagon chief, is unthinkably painful for the average American. And this, who put up the matter, you know very well. No matter what the truth circles, until it will not be shown on television a majority of Americans do not even take into consideration. It 's like the greengrocer told you that your mother has schemed to kill you and claim to give you all the evidence: I do not even consider a little' because it is the fruit, but mainly because the possibility that he is right it would be too painful for you. If, however, I will announce on television. . .
However, this is not true only for all Americans, but for all of us. The way it's structured our mind is what it is. Our mind protects itself in the face of interpretations of reality that it is not ready to deal with, maintaining a familiar and reassuring vision of things. The mind comes to conclusions which has convenience in coming.
In psychological jargon is called confirmation bias (35) and is an intellectually disturbing phenomenon to which we are all subject to nature. Our mind takes note of the data it receives on a selective basis, noting and overestimating the information that confirm our beliefs, and ignoring or downplaying information that contradicts our beliefs. We are all subject to this phenomenon, but some (actually many) of us are to a greater extent than others, and may, occasionally or systematically, even to deny the obvious.
For this reason, the September 11 conspirators have very little to fear the emergence of the (alleged) truth. The bulk of the world population has in mind a very specific history, shared by all, and this is the film America Under Attack. Most people will never abandon this altogether comfortable conviction, unless they receive input from a person to whom they recognize the authority which they can not resist (the Television, a parent, one-person-in-what-they-have-faith). When this happens, we see another type of cognitive bias, in its way even more fascinating: the hindsight bias, ie the error of hindsight. The hindsight bias is the tendency of people to believe, wrongly, that they would be able to predict an event correctly, once the event has become known. The day on which the hypothetical and various CNN newscasts blessing him with the authority of an alternative version of the story of September 11 and the surrounding area, all individuals until then anchored to the previous version of the facts instantly magical paradigm shift, starting immediately restructure their memories to fit the new reality. Begin to remember that he had suspicions from the start, and soon began to mutter things like, I told myself! The hindsight bias
change our memories to fit the contingencies of cognitive presence. It 's a common phenomenon, happens in small doses to all of us every day, in large doses is observed in the policy every time a review (or ideology) is changed to another: all (or most) people who believed that opinion (or ideology), not just magically change its view (or ideology), but also remember that they have the views that have previously had.
epidemic SARS
That said, I wonder how many painful truths to be able to withstand my readers, or to what extent are under the protective shield of their confirmation bias. If they persist in reading this far I imagine that this analysis does not leave them completely indifferent, and still be well able to bear it. Perhaps
The hindsight bias has already run to their aid. Why, if desired, to put meat on the fire there still holds full. . .
Speaking of coincidences - and say that today we have already made a great feast - has anyone noticed the fact mica curious coincidence that while the invasion of Iraq China broke out in the epidemic of SARS, atypical pneumonia? It 'obvious that, unlike previous ones, is really just a coincidence. It 'also true that new diseases and new wars do not break every ten minutes, so it is very unusual for a new war and a new human disease appear on the scene exactly the same time. On the other hand, given a chance to chance! Do not make the mistake of paranoid need to find relationships between events are separate and distinct! What can you never have to deal with SARS, the war against Iraq, or the recent mysterious death of at least 15 microbiologists around the world? However
. . .
The world population is doubling every thirty years. It 'an exponential increase which will inevitably lead sooner or later (sooner rather than later) to a global catastrophe, with hundreds of millions - or billions - of dead, unless you can shut down immediately population growth in developing countries world. It 's a well known problem especially in the community of science fiction fans, as many SF writers have extensively dealt with for half a century now. The problem is that the only realistic to stop population growth in a poor country is to significantly raise the standard of living of people so that their children are to represent us as a cost rather than a resource. This, which is the only realistic solution is impossible, however, for three main reasons: 1. Lack of resources at the global level 2. Lack of waste from countries loot (our current well-being is based on the exploitation of resources and cheap labor in poor countries - if all the world become wealthy, who is exploited to generate so much wealth?) 3. If possible, against all laws of physics, to raise the living standards of all poor countries to our standards (or even only half or one third of our standard), human society immediately succumb under the weight of pollution, loss of all forests, global warming and other disaster striking. Anyway, if assumed to resist even a few years, then would suddenly oil and then finally greetings to all. A recent article titled Earth Will Expire by 2050 (36a, 36b) reports a study by the WWF in 2050, according to which, however, there will be no more fish in the oceans, there will be no forests, drinking water will be undrinkable and walking everywhere and it will take two more planet Earth to provide the necessary resources to human society to survive in the current mode. Imagine if you put even the Third World to eat like us! The bomb was primed and the fuse is rapidly consuming. In a little burst.
In practice, in the real world, there is no known solution to the problems and the road to disaster Natural down and without forks.
Good. That is, patience. So, what can I do or you? Kick it while it lasts.
, however, change the point of view. You're not who you are. You are a very high official in the Pentagon or the CIA. You know these things and like you to know your colleagues. The best analysts and the scientists you have repeated ad nauseam - is half a century it must be repeating to you and your predecessors, even if (perhaps) do not suggest solutions. Because there are no acceptable solutions. You know that in 1974 Kissinger had recommended to the direction of the CIA to pursue the reduction of fertility in the developing world (37) which has not been made. You know that demographic bomb is triggered devastating burst sooner or later - as is inevitable - Florida and possibly the survival of your country, perhaps even of human civilization. You know that oil is not unlimited, which is quickly consumed, and the increase in population and industrialization of new nations (eg China), it will consume more and more quickly and that will start when there be too little for the needs of all a global war for control of the last reserves will be inevitable, given that no one will voluntarily give up their well-being. You know that only a few decades separate us from this scenario by the end of the world - not thousands or millions of years, only a few dozen. You know that the natural disaster, when it happens, completely unchecked, can only kill billions of people around the world. You've asked for years if not better than a catastrophe planned and monitored. You know it's not easy to have scruples. For devotion to the idea that you have in your country (not separated by a proper portion of interest) you've already accepted the idea of \u200b\u200bkilling your fellow countrymen over three thousand in Manhattan and the Pentagon in order to get carte blanche from your people for the pursuit of American interests in the world. A painful sacrifice, but necessary. And to think that in order to minimize the loss of life you have planned the attack early morning, when the bulk of 50. 000 individuals who daily throng the Twin Towers is still at work, a terrorist must have acted as a mid-day, but you're not a terrorist. Are you a patriot who understands that great power involves great responsibility (it tells Spider-Man), and that the life of the individual is insignificant compared to the welfare and safety of the group and future generations. You have agreed to invade distant countries, killing tens of thousands of its inhabitants. As an undertaker or a surgeon, the death of others does not make you more effective. The demographic explosion problem haunts you, especially in relation to the availability of oil, because you're a rational individual and you are trained to see the long-term consequences of events, decisions and strategies. You also know things that normal people do not know. Learn about the results of research on biological warfare conducted by other parts of your organization. You know that back in 1970, your armed forces have created influenza virus mutants by crossing it with viruses that produce acute leukemia, as well as to obtain a lethal form of cancer-action quickly able to spread like the flu every sneeze. But you know how many. You know a lot more. You also know the results of three decades of subsequent research. You know you have to return the instrument in the hands of at least 100 years the problem of overpopulation. Deciding to death of individuals does not make you far effect. You're a soldier, it's your job. You've already done. You do it every day. A million or a billion, what's the difference? They are just numbers. They would be dead anyway, having played and have exacerbated the problem. Diseases are a clean death, the principal is invisible. In many ways, restores the balance of nature, altered by the invention of medicine. What's the harm in restoring the balance of nature that human progress has compromised? Especially if the world is still condemned to death within fifty years. Together with your colleagues you're convinced that a disaster is controlled at least better than a natural disaster. It 's always more difficult find excuses not to take action. The reasons for the action you have. Have you discussed for years along with other strategists. Have you already decided what diseases it takes, after a thousand reflections among the choices provided. You have the power to act. And what about the know-how. . . More or less you have, too. But it is not prudent to proceed without one or more general tests, carried out with lethal diseases reduced to make your know-how truly complete and foolproof. A virus with a 4% mortality may be fine to begin with. It 'important to study well the patterns of spread of the virus, the efficiency of health institutions in containing the epidemic, the response in terms of collective psychosis by populations. In war, the timing is essential. There is also a good time to blow up an epidemic. The ideal is to coincide with the start of the war operations in Iraq. In this way, any of the two events were to go the wrong way, the media would immediately available alternative on which to redirect the attention. You take pleasure in your mind. The epidemic of pneumonia as a parachute media war in Iraq that went wrong and the war in Iraq as media parachute outbreak of pneumonia that out of control. There would have thought even Frederick Forsythe!, You find yourself playing with your colleagues. Then, set the time of the jokes and comes the moment of final decisions: time to turn plans into actions that change the history of mankind. There is a time when a final cold shiver down my spine you salt, but it's nothing that you can not overcome. (38)
enough. You no longer you or you're not better than that other than for five minutes pretending to be you and you're back, what they read the story, not those who plot against the law.
plans for the future?
I understand your state of mind and reassure you immediately: despite what you just read, you have no reason to worry!
Feel better now?
You have no reason to worry for the simple fact that in this case do not worry in any way change the course of events, so you might as well be from now on - instead of worrying about - you focus instead on enjoying life you have left (scherzetto!), a council still valid though. Seriously, you can always console with the following topics:
1. It may be that the emergence of a new disease with exactly the appearance of American troops in Iraq is actually just a coincidence, after all unlikely things happen every now and really, there really is someone who wins the lottery (even if you never do)
2. If it is not a coincidence, can always be that it is only the operation tactical parachute media mentioned above, and which is not a dress rehearsal for The Big One.
3. If it is a rehearsal for a view of Operation Thinning Humanity, you can always hope that the biological weapons being used are at least smart enough (like bombs) to be designed to save you. It 'is well known that there are searches for the creation of gene-specific bioweapons in practice viruses that affect only certain ethnic groups. In this case, you never take risks. Unless, for full of bad luck, your DNA is not in line with the new rules allowed secret in terms of DNA, in which case patience. And something tells me that if you are not blond, blue-eyed, fair-skinned and some freckles in the face, you have some reason to worry.
4. You can hope that this is a trivial operation of bio-economic warfare. (I talk about the war bioeconomic below)
5. Who writes what you're reading has also written several books of fiction. This can be a comforting argument. Or disturbing. The choice is yours.
As the picture of reality that we are painting looks more and more like a science fiction scenario, we might as well let go even after a couple of purely speculative science fiction, more than anything to cheer us up.
Thinning Operation Humanity itself probably will not begin until the research gene-specific bioweapons has reached high levels of refinement. You can then talk of surgical epidemics or outbreaks fairly targeted to destroy only specific breeds or carriers of specific facial features. In fact it is called the only surgical epidemic among employees in the work of extermination, as the general public, for reasons of political correctness (some might judge the epidemic as a surgical procedure slightly Nazi), will present a different reality, the reality of a world that is always difficult and cruel, but in the modern era in which science stands heroically in defense of our lives in a dramatic race against time striving to discover new treatments able to cope with the new evils of nature. Vaccines and drugs will be made from time to time just in time to allow classes to the wealthy to invest in health is a bit 'of their money. The noble purpose of financing pharmaceutical research will also create chronic disease designed to provide a reservoir of customers, patients are destined to pay dearly for the rest of their life, the miraculous medicine that can keep them alive (just as already happens with AIDS - behold! another coincidence, but how lucky we are today!). The pharmaceutical industry has as its mission to make chronic disease the patient rather than cure them (for the pharmaceutical industry would be a disaster if all heal indeed from their evils, as rightly professes also Beppe Grillo in his sermons underground, now in Italy is now one of the cults of the network (39) and in the future when the industry for the treatment of diseases can work hand in hand with industry to generation of the same, we will see some good! Ma. . we are confident that we are not already seeing?
Coincidence or no coincidence, SARS has curiously centered the target of one of the most pressing and controversial issues that America finds itself facing today: the emergence of China as a new superpower. On the one hand China's development is a long-term the biggest threat ever to American hegemony, the other in the short term it is a very useful (if not indispensable) market in which to place their products, thus being able to (perhaps) to postpone a dramatic downturn. SARS has providentially dealt a hard blow, but not deadly, the Chinese economy, slowing down a bit 'development without, however, that the important China market which is being lost.
to think evil is a sin, but. . .
The case of missing microbiologists
Remember the fifteen microbiologists that have been discussed recently died in an unusual way (most explicitly was killed, the others had strange incidents) in various parts of the world? It was not very believable that they all had to do a phenomenon in its modest way as the anthrax letters sent to America in the autumn of 2001. So unless you want to believe that the occurrence of a sequence of coincidences really extreme and virtually impossible, there must be some reason, perhaps more important to the trouble to get them out. More important. . .
What happened recently again, in the field of microbiology, which is more important than the anthrax letters?
The outbreak of SARS. There is no comparison.
usually kill themselves when they know something that scientists would be better if they did not know and you kill them before they reveal what they know.
Could it be that scientists killed knew something about the epidemic of SARS, it would be unseemly to know that you were around? On the other hand, what else untoward may have heard, these scientists, enough to make someone decide to remove them? Be careful about how you respond to that question! For the response to that fear of more might actually be the most attractive and desirable between cases feasible. If the 15
microbiologists recently died in mysterious conditions around the world have been killed for what they knew about SARS, this means that - despite what you think probably - we probably go well this time too. The alternative is In fact, much, much more alarming.
Set yourself in the shoes of the mighty lord of the secret services with the know-how, the power and ruthlessness needed to launch biological warfare. Suppose that the project Thinning Humanity has already been drawn up in all its details. Have already been decided and made ready to use viruses, various unknown diseases have all their impressive first name first (by the way, do not you surprised how quickly the atypical pneumonia has been named SARS - Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome - just a great name, who knows who came to mind...) and the roadmap for the new disease is established. Only small problem: viruses and bacteria necessary for biological warfare do not grow on trees, it takes scientists - many scientists - to develop them. A lot of scientists around the world therefore has a direct or indirect worked on viruses and bacteria equal or similar to those that are being used in biological warfare in preparation, and when the disease first appear, these scientists will gather to learn things would be better if they did not know, because they might be tempted to go around, perhaps due to the fact that they do not share the use of their research is done. . . If you were going to give way to a biological warfare and for any reason in the world will look like this, what to do about the problem of scientists who know? back to you. Perhaps you are reading that you have the most compelling argument to provide a plausible explanation for the death in mysterious conditions of 15 microbiologists around the world in a short period of time when the present incumbent, is not it? By waste of optimism we can always force us to believe that scientists have been killed for reasons truly virtuous, that prevent them from producing biological weapons that terrorists could use. The important thing is not to ask too much who stars in these effects might be terrorists. One thing is certain: many of these scientists was the American, British or Israeli. For who could ever work? To which projects had worked in the past? Who killed them? Why? And if they were killed to remove the back scientists can find cures to outbreaks planned?
The advice that I give you, however, is again to relax, to think of something else, a refreshing un'orzata, to go on vacation, to distract him with a porn movie. In all cases do not take air travel on which microbiologists specialize in DNA sequencing (the exact type of scientist at risk - behold! Exactly the kind of expertise needed to genetically manipulate the coronavirus responsible for SARS, another coincidence (40) ). In all the aircraft came down in Europe recently there was at least a microbiologist of such a board (Zurich, Swissair flight, November 24, 2001) when no more (Black Sea, direct air from Israel to Novosibirsk, pulled down by mistake by an errant Ukrainian missile off course by 100 km, at least five microbiologists on board, 4 October 2001). Were therefore Rest easy. Need not fret. Stay away from planes, take vitamins, sedatives and watch the news do not listen to the scientists of the Russian Academy of nasty medicine that explicitly claim that the SARS virus is a biological weapon created in the laboratory since it consists of a cocktail of genetic material different types of virus that could in any way natural blend. (41)
If I were you I would start to really only worry about the day when the news began to speak of a new disease, yet, a condition never seen before and particularly virulent. Especially if it were a horrible disease that now affects only animals, but some fear that one day could mutate and be transmitted to humans. It would be almost a must if you think about it, to remove suspects from the theory that the virus may have been created in the laboratory. Luckily they are not things that happen every day.
Unfortunately, believe it or not, it happened today, about two hours ago (subjective time of the writer). He wrote these lines in the early afternoon of 11 May 2003 and almost my thoughts in response to the news RAI has recently reported about a terrible animal plague epidemic broke out in a poultry farm in Germany, with the concern that it may one day be transmitted to humans, with dire consequences, infinitely worse than SARS. We, however, we have grown accustomed to the coincidences, we know we live in a magical world, so let's enjoy the beautiful season, let a bath of sun and sea and not think about it anymore. Let's just hope that instead of the beginning of Operation Humanity Thinning what we are seeing are only small-scale bio-economic warfare.
War bioeconomic
Never heard of bio-economic warfare? Ah, yes, the news do not talk, for some reason. So let's think of us to dedicate a couple of lines. The bio-economic warfare is essentially a biological warfare aimed primarily at undermining the economy of a country. Some claim that already against Cuba in the seventies, the United States would secretly conducted acts of war bioeconomic, introducing the country animal and plant diseases of various kinds. Today, the spread of SARS in China has all the appearance of being, above all, an act of war bioeconomic likely to slow the development of China. Some even suggested that bio-economic warfare will be undertaken by the United States against countries that have opposed the war in Iraq, inspired by the news story that a ship from Brazil to Egypt leaving Quebec a sailor died after contracting anthrax by opening a suitcase that contained it. Quebec is the French-speaking region of Canada, where opposition to the war in Iraq was similar to that in France. If the anthrax had come to, for some time Quebec would not have enjoyed it very much. Interestingly, Canada has already suffered serious economic damage, also because of SARS. (42)
If this hypothesis is based, we would expect short-term bio-economic warfare annoying even against France, Germany and Russia, the other three great nations, in addition to China, for opposing the war on Iraq. Maybe Russia will be spared, because damage its already fragile economy could lead to other problems - an option unbecoming in a nation still full of nuclear weapons.
for it! One, two, three. . . abracadabra! Fever epidemic in poultry farms in Germany. The appetizer is served. We'll see what will follow. (43a, 43b, 43c, 43D, 43rd, 43f)
History of the glory of the Bush dynasty
The player concerned is already in the meantime will be asked, then this article is really a punch in the stomach for the Bush administration, its dirty intrigue, the CIA, the Pentagon and the military-industrial bloc behind? And 'This is one of the last times there will be a Delos free, a Sci-Fi. com that the abominations of this complaint, as well as the future, before ruthless secret agents suppress the writing of Delos sending nasty emails infected by anthrax? But no, no, what have you got it! We are in Alice in Wonderland, things are not what they seem even after they have been exposed, the deception is sublime because it is squared, cubed, nth degree! The Bush campaign is possibly part of the fabric of diabolical events scheduled.
George W. Bush is not bad, really. His father probably did. His grandfather certainly yes. (The Bush family fortune was made by his grandfather, Prescott Bush, funding the Nazi regime when it was America's enemy, and immediately after the war, while we're on the subject, it seems that the CIA imported Nazi in America many Europeans (such as Reinhard Gehlen) with the task secret of creating a far right within the party rebubblicano, apparently successfully (44a, 44b)).
George W. Bush is not a bad person, you read him in the face - and physiognomy is not an opinion! You go for example to see the video in which he is in nursery school during the attack of September 11, (45) has lost expression, perhaps guilty, but not the culprit that has engineered something, rather than the witness involuntary plays bigger than him (do not forget that when these shots were made, Bush, by his own admission had already seen the movie with the crash of the first plane into the WTC). Every time he talks about terrorism and foreign policy seems to walk on hot coals. George W. Bush is a former frichettone that one day closed with alcohol to give themselves to Jesus Christ and who still tries to work as little as possible. So naive that his statements are grotesque even become the object of worship. (46) To me it's almost funny.
Yet, on the Internet where information still has a bubble of freedom, George W. Bush is guilty of a designated number. This is So the role that you are embroidering on the benefit of posterity. Even seemingly free entries and then collaborate in the preparation of any ritual sacrifice of the scapegoat of the moment.
So we write that we are serving the hidden puppeteers! Yeah, because like it or not democracy has become a folk tradition, a custom must be preserved for its high aesthetic values, for a long time is no longer (if it ever was) a system for electing governments. The Zeitgeist of contemporary politics is the theme Cryptocracy. Most of the real and powerful are not humans are invisible (please do not think of extraterrestrials, if you really want to give a face to these entities think of the boards instead, but it is not exactly what I meant), and also between the humans are the real powerful but invisible, since invisibility is one of the essential keys of power when the forces involved are so great. George W. Bush is the puppet of these great powers, and his sacrifice and his lieutenants have already put in quote. They are even ready-made playing cards with the faces of American war criminals - just like the Americans did with the Iraqi hierarchy, (47) of the series who does expect it. We'll see what cards will be deployed and when. Like chess, no move is predetermined, their pieces are sacrificed only when necessary - see microbiologists - and even the most important pieces are safe if their sacrifice allows the player to win the game in covert action. If and when Bush will never be sacrificed, the move will provide a cathartic moment for greedy that humanity waiting for justice, a great popular festival of exorcism of evil that will be remembered in time, as if it had really been what it seemed, and not one of the many tribal rituals of the largest tribes in the world - humanity. For what do we know it is entirely possible (though not entirely likely) that the terrorist plot of 9 / 11 has been designed from the start with all errors and lead to the guilty indicia designated "Dubya" Bush, the president and half cartoon half cheerleader, the truculent Dr. Strangelove Cheney and Rumsfeld the Cyborg (still alive after two heart attacks and various bypass). More paranoid (or more realistically?), We can assume that the great puppeteers have not cared that much of the details of trusting that the scaffolding of this version of reality should take only a couple of years - a goal provided a stabilizing effect of confirmation bias in people's minds. After that the operation would slowly began Thinning Humanity and grappling with the pressing emergency of an epidemic after another Who ever would have far more concerned about the mysteries of September 11? And in case of need, nothing prevents a new sensational terrorist attack on American soil to American citizens to reiterate the argument that their enemy is outside. Some even talk of a small nuclear strike, because the special effects exceed those of 11 September 2001, in the best Hollywood tradition that every sequel should contain more and even better special effects than earlier works. In all cases, the route taken by those who run America today is a slope on which it is forbidden to stop. Only a continuous state of emergency can cloud the growing minds of ordinary people to the extent sufficient to maintain the huge collective illusion in place. In a game like that, he who hesitates is lost. However, at the time, Hitler did not stop as expected, but it was lost anyway. Perhaps he was after all only an amateur.
The Library of Babel
Well, then this is apparently the world in which we find ourselves today. I have previously asked twice, my patient readers, to bring in the shoes of the gentlemen hypothetical pulling the strings of these combinations of events. I hope that you have done, and I hope even more that those clothes then you are out. I therefore ask you now to get in a couple of other clothes. My. Put yourself in my shoes then
. I am not at all anti-American. I know I grew up in the shadow of American cultural archetypes that have soaked the free time for all of us. I have read infinitely many more books written by Americans of Italian books as well as American films I've seen much more than Italians. Every now and even eat from McDonalds (never when I'm in Italy, however, where my good taste - not ideology - I always find better alternatives), managed to surprise all the time without the incredible variety of what I and yet find myself chewing drawing quell'inquietante tranquilizzazione sense of recognition that the experience produces. If for no other reason than the great masterpieces of half a century of science fiction are very happy that America exists! I am therefore not at all anti-American and one day, irritated by what I see and hear on television about the war in Iraq decides to write an article for Delos, do Internet searches to document and since it does not hurt me in the cable this sense (I will not be as clever as the runner-net described by Gibson, but I defend myself), I soon find myself trapped for 18 hours a day in a tangle of complex data more or less likely, many of which are quite shocking. The existing material on the web is immense, the more you look the more you find, but all is not reliable: information are perfectly plausible place in the same sites in which they also hollowed out pseudo-secrets relating to autopsies of aliens or conspiracies of the devil. Virtually, the network offers plenty of arguments to support any argument you want. Want some examples? Because behind the September 11 attacks could not be even Bill Gates? Said and done, there is a place to discover new faults Osama Bin Gates (48). Unless you are willing to Bill Gates, why not opt \u200b\u200bfor the Black Pope, (49) as the enigmatic figure of the sovereign pontiff would only be a humble servant? Then we are sure that there were planes that morning in Manhattan? Could not have been all digital special effects like a German site claims? (50) Why the Space Shuttle would explode themselves? It 'obvious that there is behind a conspiracy. (51) We are confident that Bush was not a pedophile? Of course not. You also investigate the mysteries of his alleged pedophilia. (52) While we're talking about Daddy Bush, what about the idea that it was he - at that time vice president - to organize the attempt on Reagan? Excellent idea! Go to pry even in the cases you find that George Bush was a good friend of the father of the assassination attempt and that his son had planned a dinner with his brother on the evening of the attack of the aggressor (sic). (53a, 53b, 53c) It stinks the way that John Lennon is dead? Then investigated as to who would were the real instigators. (54) Who really killed Lady Diana? (55A, 55B) is whether they instead had faked his own death to take off parapazzi of the way once and for all? (56)
By the way, that will not be made out the last scion of the Kennedy to stop one day to become President of the United States? (Which is also likely). (57) And to finish with a flourish: UFOs exist and whether there have the death ray? Mussolini was perhaps a ufology? The answer is in the internet for those who are willing to believe, is of course yes!. (58)
You are in my clothes? Well. Faced with such a mass of disparate information, the only thing to do as an alternative to turn off your computer is to get good buzz to distinguish the most appropriate information from the obvious nonsense, sort data, build on the synthesis suggested by others and then make their own personal synthesis. The result of this process is inevitably different for each one that engages you, because there are different analytical skills and beliefs that influence the formation of judgments in each of us. No version (except for a hypothetically) can contain the whole truth, only truth and nothing but the truth. We must therefore take all these hypotheses with pliers and remember that any part of the events that emerges is potentially both true and false. The element of chance should never be disregarded. Only a competent and impartial tribunal (if something like this exists) could in principle with authority to certify a history as true or false.
That said, back in my shoes, if by chance we are in the meantime slipped out. Previously mentioned my little anti-Americanism (not to be confused with a naive pleasure pro-Americanism). This simply means that my very own confirmation bias, ie the propensity of my mind to filter incoming information tends to make initially skeptical of theorems such as those presented in this article, at least until such time as the convergence of evidence is not face critical mass and I find myself forced to not being able to circumvent an alternative interpretation of reality, something else is obviously a professional anti-Americanism (anti-Americanism is also a profession, with its career, its hierarchies and practical situations, which big stars run merrily over the world jumping from one conference to another, deriving from their prestige and money - in what is also clearly there is nothing wrong with that), which will logically reverse confirmation bias than the other, or be more inclined to assimilate any information intended to confirm its anti-American beliefs, demonstrating against deafness to issues with respect to opposites. Anti-Americanism gets a professional to see how this affected to some extent his credibility in the eyes of a neutral audience, which typically houses the general mass of the moment and therefore a bias confirms the opposite. But all this has more to do with my shoes, in which I get invited to, then go back to the bomb.
Both you and I are so in my shoes, we are strettini, but luckily we did not stay long. It all started with a curiosity and a Google search. Ah! What on earth could have made Sherlock Holmes, if only Google had available! A search led to another and after a while, 'the first disconcerting thesis take shape and a paranoid dream open eyes begin to mark your every waking moment. Until all of a sudden you feel like James Belbo, the character of Foucault's Pendulum Umberto Eco, who assumed to play a universal conspiracy hatched by the Templars who unexpectedly turns out to be true. It is not a calming feeling. . .
Anyone could have done to my or your place. The Internet is in every house and every child knows how to use Google. Giving credit to some data than others, according to a certain track ignoring other very much, everybody can build up the representation of reality far more suited to the characteristics of their psychic nature.
's why I have repeatedly said that what I wrote in this article is not demonstrably true. It 's just one of the possible representations of reality, in my view more plausible and less silly that the media representation of the vehicle involved, but not necessarily true.
moral approach
I do not consider my job to give an explicit opinion on a moral to the scenario represented by me. Each draw their own conclusions and live their own feelings, without any of my suggestions. Many of the sites on the net dealing with this issue mixed data with moral judgments, and sometimes the effect is not the most fortunate, because the message that shines from one line to the other ends up being something like: Look at what we do these bad guys!
However, to make things easier for readers in any difficulty in forming their own opinions, here are some typical pre-cooked and possible reviews to choose from, obviously only for the case when the full theorem of this article is founded, thinning population included:
moral approach Classico
The elements of the U.S. government and / or the various military and intelligence agencies that were organized or collaborated in the September 11 attacks have made serious and unforgivable crimes against humanity, both for the dead in attacks and for those in the wars and epidemics that followed. They are also guilty of high treason against their country, the United States of America. No reason can justify such acts in the world, in all respects comparable to the Nazi crimes. Those responsible should be judged by an American court that an international court, and subject to the appropriate penalties which are imposed on them.
Hypocrite Standard Approach
E 'yet another version of the usual conspiracy theory. We must not give heed to these lies without any foundation, that would ultimately divert our forces by finding and punishing the real culprits, terrorists.
cynical approach Visionary
According to WWF the world will be uninhabitable in 50 years or so. Evidence and history teach us that humanity does not have the maturity necessary to spontaneously change their behavior in a direction compatible with their survival. A strong power able to dominate the world and to cleverly adjust the operation, intervening where necessary with disasters subsidiaries, is a lesser evil than the extinction of the human species. The premature mortality (deaths would sooner or later anyway) of millions or even billions of human beings, from a historical point of view, is completely irrelevant, as history itself teaches. The disturbing element in all this is related to the taboo of death in contemporary Western culture is imbued with, from taboos which we can not afford to be influenced.
rational-Optimistic Asimov
According to WWF the world will be uninhabitable in 50 years or so, because of the impact of advances in science and technology. But the only force capable of finding solutions to the problems created by science and science itself, as has always been and always will be. And is therefore the science that politicians have to resort (but not to create biological weapons in the laboratory!) Take the road to a global techno-dictatorship option is not acceptable in a world in which it is worth living. Humanity must identify and punish the perpetrators of this crime and use the shock of this revelation as the stimulus for a decisive change of direction in current world politics that are driving the planet towards catastrophe.
Nihilist relativist approach
According to WWF the world will be uninhabitable in 50 years or so, so who cares what is happening today - in 50 years and one day all our talk today will no longer be any difference. All in all it is good that humanity stand aside. Life is still boring and basically meaningless.
Zen Approach Fatalist
Everything that happens is exactly the only thing that could happen, as everything that will happen will be the only thing that can happen. There is no reason to worry, because all phenomena are manifestations of Buddha and the bodhisattva path to pass through the sale of the goals and desires. It 's the nature of the world that the cycles of happiness to alternate cycles of unhappiness. Trying to escape unhappiness is what creates our unhappiness. The suffering must be respected, not circumvented. All suffering is a consequence of karma and accept suffering, karma disappear. When you die, you should die. The future and the past should be forgotten. We must focus on the present and realize within himself ku, emptiness. When you think with your mind, you are lost in the enigma. The ultimate truth should not think either. The Path exists, but who takes it.
surrealist approach
This started happening a few American artists of the 11 September 2001 is no doubt an important, if not essential, cutting-edge contemporary art. A wide variety of styles and techniques have been used - for the first time in the history of art - the creation of this four-dimensional platform, unique in its kind. From the traditional visual cinematic techniques (the event in Manhattan) to unpublished work of sculpture made with innovative instruments socioetnoplastica tanatotipici (in the open studio of Afghanistan and Iraq), until the new techniques of viral Noematica full-impact arts combined with the more advanced arts microscultura genetics of RNA to create a momentum of refined tanatogenesi (in China), all tempered with clever use of memes acts semantically merge all parties until the final generation of the complete gestalt of authentic, which is not is a happening or a series of separate incidents, but a true collective state of mind four-dimensional, or a titanic global Weltanschauung and persistent psychotic Dickian illusion of pure inspiration. The work would, however, imperfect though it did not contain within it the seeds of its own self-destruction is not trivial, necessary to finally bring to light his true nature and essence of art, an objective that can not be separated by a concrete gesture, active and clear of all beings Human hitherto passive participant in the work in the role of individuals who believe in this illusory world view. To give full meaning and historical work of art as such, therefore, all human beings in the world who have for years believed in the official representation of events began on 11 September to their combined order to bring a lawsuit for fraud and simple international moral damages against the authors of the work.
-Racist Approach vulgar
have done well. Better them that we, no? I had my way, I killed them all at once, and we salute you. There is also far too many people in the world! Listen to me, all like-minded, but nobody has the balls to say it.
Former military instrument
Did you find between these proceedings more in keeping with your character? Or are you able to articulate an opinion without resorting to my own templates? Better that way. More than one of them is indeed disturbing.
not the situation itself is calming. If nothing else, being optimistic at all costs, this new interpretation of reality will make our lives less boring in the future.
I know, I know, it's nice to realize that all our memories about the events of September 11 have strong chance of being essentially false, that what we thought was reality is eventually revealed to be instead an artifact, a 'psicoguerra weapon used against us. On the other hand was to be expected that by dint of wait, sooner or later the future arrived. The future may prove to be a much less pleasant place to the one outlined in the worst nightmares of Philip K. Dick. After all, it is perhaps now an established principle Reality that always exceeds your imagination? Those who know the literature of Philip K. Dick know what I'm talking about.
a famous essay by Philip Dick headline: If you think this ruthless world, you should see what are the others. Well, maybe one of the other worlds are beginning to glimpse. Hurrah! Maybe it's time for all good that we beat boredom.
newspapers and TV news from around the world such things there is for the moment (almost) track. On the Internet, in this regard, there is more than a track: is there anything, even if the information is scattered, fragmented and not necessarily reliable. On the other hand, we saw the information that traditional media are not for nothing reliable, and living the Internet!
It 'important to note that a theorem like that - true or false - could never be formed before the birth of the Internet. We recall that the Internet was invented as a tool the U.S. military to ensure communications in case of planetary wars. Paradoxically, the myth of Frankenstein as the creature is now turning against the creator, allowing citizens of the world to exchange information and to expose what increasingly looks like a chilling plot U.S. military.
The fact that the mainstream media around the world stubbornly ignore news of this magnitude leads to other thoughts.
E 'entirely possible in the world that is forming the journalists as we understand them today (prostitutes and the full service of those who pay them instead of the truth as it should be) are found to be an obsolete category, to which no one will listen because the Internet will provide a better alternative . In the world of Internet information is conveyed by anyone willing to move - then so much the worse for journalists who choose to forego a part of this human category. Many alternative news sites on the Internet today are already living the financial support that their readers voluntarily bestow them. This means that in future there will probably be more and more space in the world for journalists intellectually honest and, perhaps (although having to be honest I'm afraid they are not), less and less room for dishonest journalists.
I know, I'm sinning of idealism, for a brief moment I confused fantasy and reality, but I am also human and I have my limits. The Great Puppet succeed sooner or later - certainly we are trying (59) - to link their wireless everything which is expressed on the Internet.
Everything you ever wanted to know? No, not everything
In the meantime, be satisfied with what we pass the convent, which is the most amazing plot ever concocted and put into operation in living memory - and excuse me if it is little. As I said and repeated many times, I urge you not believe a word of what I have written. The television has not announced these things (so far), I'm not a journalist (in fact I wrote several books of fiction), so what I wrote belongs according to the conventions in place in the world of fantasy, a fiction is artificial, so inspired to a fact, but in its various details is no proven relationship with the world of reality. I lied then, with the excuse to warn you that I would. However, my lie has two faces, one of which has so far remained hidden, the title promised everything you ever wanted to know about September 11th 2001 but had never dared to ask. This promise has indeed been maintained within the limits of my ability? I told you so really all I could about it? The answer is no. Missing at least half the story. But for now I think I have already written enough. And since no one pays me to do it, I write only to the extent and exactly where I want to do it.
tell this story was a physiological act necessary for me. Because as I said and repeated that it is fiction, I am reminded by analogy that other famous story of the past, in which a king when he walks around naked for the kingdom claiming to be dressed, and all his subjects do not pretend to notice her nudity for fear of losing their heads in acceptance of the Executioner. The stories are after all the show always the same and for some reason, I told him that today seems like a clone of the little story of the naked king. I will be naive, I may be wrong, I'll need glasses, but I really think that the king is naked again, and that all we pretend nothing. So do not abbiatemene if, like the child in the fable, m'è ran a few comments about his nakedness. Who knows that making out does not notice it even more. It can not really most of these exhibitionists.
0 comments:
Post a Comment